03-30-13
P3
It means “Demanding Empathy and
Understanding through Cultural Connections”….
I
found that most of the film portrayed refugees through their own personal
stories. Rather than making the study of the displacement a scientific study or
one narrated by a professor, the film gained credibility by presenting the
facts through the voices of experience. As a self-proclaimed film critic, I
feel that it was the documentary’s attempt at ethos, being their most prominent
measure of rhetoric technique.
The
film portrays refugees and the refugee experience through a classical
ethnography—a study of the culture or subculture of people through qualitative research.
A little tangent – the most interesting portion of the documentary was of the
portion of the documentary devoted to the Sudanese perspective of the US:
people are lazy, with a lot more fat on their bones and (of course) money. This
perspective of the US honed the ultimate viewer appreciation of the
authenticity of the documentary. The transparent view of the refugees was
refreshing; God Grew Tired of Us
became more a political statement and truth than a PR effort concerned with
profit.
The
statistics given in the story highlighted the precise nature of the title, God Grew Tired of Us. The fact that
27,000 young men were forced to move to Ethiopia and crystalize makeshift
families in order to survive or the fact that the colony of travelling refugees
was reduced to 12, 000 (a loss of approximately 15,000 refugees) from the start
of the war in Sudan forces one to recognize the reality of the situation and
the hardship of the victims.
One
depiction which I noticed was the same in both Amal Hassan Fadlalla’s
discussion of the refugees and the one in the documentary was the notion of the
“Lost Boys” of Sudan. While Fadlalla focuses on the subaltern (or widespread inferior)
nature of social welfare and politics, the documentary similarly talks of the
longest civil war between the North and the South. This depiction of the “Lost Boys” from Perer
Pan made a pop-culture connotation for those who could still not grasp the
gravity of the situation. It is from this depiction of lost children of Peter
Pan—boys without homes, those without a homeland (or anything to live for)—serves
as a metaphor for the nature of the boys of refugee camp. This commonality
forces understanding. The cultural reference allows for people (originating
from a bubble of perfection and infallibility) to know and empathize for those
children of a refugee status and of a “lost”-status (seeking care and some sort
of attention, with nowhere/no ultimate goal of feasible achievement) in the
face of all adversity and misunderstanding.
It means “Demanding Empathy and
Understanding through Cultural Connections”…
Peace
and Blessings!
Jaser
No comments:
Post a Comment